//
you're reading...
MSK, Neuro, Pediatrics

Depressed Skull Fracture in an Infant – Non-accidental Trauma versus Accidental Trauma

History: Infant status post fall from 4 feet.

Depressed Skull Fracture: 3D Reconstruction of a head CT reveals a large depressed skull fracture of the right posterior parietal bone (yellow arrows).

Depressed Skull Fracture: 3D Reconstruction of a head CT reveals a large depressed skull fracture of the right posterior parietal bone (yellow arrows).

This is the appearance of a depressed skull fracture in an infant. In the setting of skull fractures in an infant, one always has to rule out the presence of non-accidental trauma (NAT), which is medical-speak for child abuse. There are multiple characteristics of skull fractures which lead one to believe it was the result of an accident, such as a short segment linear fracture through the parietal bone. Features that suggest non-accidental trauma (read: “child abuse”) include multiple or complex fractures, large fractures, depressed fractures (seen above), more than one bone, non-parietal bone involvement, and intracranial hemorrhage (read about non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage here).

Given the finding of depressed skull fracture in this case, we have to be worried about non-accidental trauma; however, we also always have to evaluate the whole picture and order a social work consult. In this case, the social worker and clinician came to the conclusion that this actually was accidental trauma, which makes for a nice happy ending.

About radiologypics

I am a radiology physician from California, USA.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Periosteal Reaction in Children Mnemonic – PERIOSTEAL SOCKS | RADIOLOGYPICS.COM - March 10, 2013

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: